A couple of key points to be made about this report:
1 - Because this report looks at schools after only one year of turnaround efforts, the findings must be considered tentative. We don't know if the 10 schools used to develop findings will continue to make rapid gains.
2 - Because many of these schools initiated reform efforts prior to receiving federal School Improvement Grant (SIG) funds, this report should not be used to make judgements about the usefulness or effectiveness of the federal intervention models, or the use of funds, external providers, or other aspects of school turnaround overall.
3 - The practices identified in this report are not new. Rather, what is important is (1) the focus and intensity of each practice and (2) that these practices worked in tandem; they are not isolated practices. To the point, rapid achievement gain schools had each of these practices in place, not just one or two; moreover, they were implementing the practices strategically, intentionally, and with a laser-like focus on improving instruction.
Additional resources on Massachusetts Level 4 Turnaround work:

No comments:
Post a Comment